|
Homework #5 -- Trip Generation Modeling [Due: Friday 15 May 2026] Problem 1 [20 points] The data in Table 1 was collected from 10 households (HH). Variables include Household Identification Number, HHID), daily trips per household (Trips), HH Income (HHInc, in $1,000s), number of cars in the HH (Cars), number of persons in the HH (HHSize), and dwelling unit type (DU, 1=Single Family; 2=Multiple Family). These 10 observations are the first set of 10 households in Table 7 [ xls ].
Table 1. Sample Household Travel and Demographic Data
------------------------------------
HHID Trips HHInc Cars HHSize DU
------------------------------------
1 4 45.0 2 3 2
2 3 40.2 1 2 2
3 4 46.5 1 1 2
4 5 50.4 2 3 2
5 6 57.3 2 2 2
6 6 49.8 2 3 1
7 7 52.5 1 2 1
8 7 55.5 2 3 1
9 6 55.8 2 3 1
10 3 42.6 1 2 2
------------------------------------
Problem 2 [20 points] Table 2 provides a category distribution of 40 households by number of persons per household (categorized as 1-2 or 3 plus) and HH income (categorized as 45k and under, 45.1 to 60k, or >60k). Each cell contains the total number of trips and the total number of households for the first 40 of 50 data points in Table 7.
Table 2. Trip Summary (HHs 1-40 only)
+------+-------------+-----+
| | HHSize | |
| HHInc+------+------+ Row |
| | 1-2 | 3+ | Tot |
+======+======+======+=====+
| .LE. | 24 | 4 | 28 |
| 45k | 7 | 1 | 8 |
+------+------+------+-----+
| 45.1 | 53 | 98 | 151 |
|to 60k| 10 | 15 | 25 |
+------+------+------+-----+
| .GT. | 0 | 66 | 66 |
| 60k | 0 | 7 | 7 |
+======+======+======+=====+
|Column| 77 | 168 | 245 |
|Total | 17 | 23 | 40 |
+------+------+------+-----+
Problem 3 [10 points] Compare your category model from Problem 2 with the corresponding regression model (see output below).
Table 3. Regression Results for Trips versus HHInc and HHSize
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------- O R D I N A R Y L E A S T S Q U A R E S ---------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
VARIABLE MEAN S.D. OBS CORREL HHInc HHSize Trips
1. HHInc 50.5080 8.7108 50 HHInc 1.0000 0.8033 0.9499
2. HHSize 2.7400 1.1031 50 HHSize 0.8033 1.0000 0.8356
3. Trips 5.6600 2.4042 50 Trips 0.9499 0.8356 1.0000
* * * * * * O R D I N A R Y L E A S T S Q U A R E S * * * * * *
MODEL: Cat.Mod.Compar. DEPENDENT VARIABLE => Trips Produced
MULTIPLE R 0.9577 * ANOVA * SUM OF SQR df MEAN SQR F
R-SQUARE 0.9171 REGRESSION 259.74 2 129.87 260.01
ADJ R-SQUARE 0.9136 RESIDUALS 23.48 47 0.50
S.E. OF EST. 0.7067 TOTAL SS 283.22 49
VARIABLE NAME B BETA S.E. B T
1. HHInc 0.2168 0.7856 0.0195 11.1411
2. HHSize 0.4458 0.2045 0.1537 2.9009
Constant -6.5124
Problem 4 [10 points] Using both the category and the regression production models, forecast the number of trips per household for the six household not used in model estimation (households 51-56; see Table 4), comparing forecast and observed trip rates. Table 4. Households for Validation Test +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ ID Trips Income Cars HHS DU | ID Trips Income Cars HHS DU +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ 51 6 45.0 2 3 2 | 54 10 59.4 3 5 1 52 3 40.2 1 2 2 | 55 8 58.5 3 4 1 53 4 49.5 1 1 2 | 56 5 43.8 2 2 1 +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ Problem 5 [10 points] The 50 households were sampled from a study area divided into three zones (TAZs). The associated population-level distributions for these zones are provided in Table 5. Compute the total number of trips produced per zone using your final category model from Problem 2. Table 5. Population Distribution of Households (HHInc by HHSize)
TAZ 1 TAZ 2 TAZ 3
+-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+
|HHSiz| 1-2 | 3-5 | Row | |HHSiz| 1-2 | 3-5 | Row | |HHSiz| 1-2 | 3-5 | Row |
|HInc | | | Tot | |HInc | | | Tot | |HInc | | | Tot |
+=====+=====+=====+=====+ +=====+=====+=====+=====+ +=====+=====+=====+=====+
|LE 45| 0 | 0 | 0 | |LE 45| 40 | 40 | 80 | |LE 45| 30 | 70 | 100 |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+
|45-60| 0 | 60 | 60 | |45-60| 40 | 80 | 120 | |45-60| 70 | 20 | 90 |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+
|GT 60| 0 | 40 | 40 | |GT 60| 20 | 80 | 100 | |GT 60| 0 | 10 | 10 |
+=====+=====+=====+=====+ +=====+=====+=====+=====+ +=====+=====+=====+=====+
| Col | 0 | 100 | 100 | | Col | 100 | 200 | 300 | | Col | 100 | 100 | 200 |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+
Problem 6 [10 points] The other side of the trip generation stage is estimating trip attractions.
The following regression-based total trip attraction model was estimated for
the region: Table 6. Demographic Data Summary +-----+------+------+------+ | TAZ | HH | POP | EMP | +=====+======+======+======+ | 1 | 100 | 300 | 0 | HH = total households +-----+------+------+------+ | 2 | 300 | 1100 | 400 | POP = total population +-----+------+------+------+ | 3 | 200 | 600 | 100 | EMP = total employment +=====+======+======+======+ | Tot | 600 | 2000 | 500 | +-----+------+------+------+ Problem 7 [10 points for 223 (Optional 10 points Extra Credit for CEE123)]
VARIABLE NAME MEAN S.D. OBS
1. Population POP 4090.90 3624.10 29
2. Labor Force LABF 1630.93 1424.85 29
3. HH Income INC 6068.55 1337.82 29
4. Employment EMPL 735.14 853.31 29
5. Work Origins TRIP 1324.93 1207.45 29
Correlation Matrix:
1. POP 1.0000 0.9971 0.0061 0.4894 0.9652
2. LABF 0.9971 1.0000 -0.0002 0.5069 0.9693
3. INC 0.0061 -0.0002 1.0000 -0.2717 0.0271
4. EMPL 0.4894 0.5069 -0.2717 1.0000 0.4778
5. TRIP 0.9652 0.9693 0.0271 0.4778 1.0000
Variables: POP LABF INC EMPL TRIP
(a) ==== OLS MODEL #1 : DEPENDENT VARIABLE => TRIP ==================
MULTIPLE R ______ * ANOVA * df SUM OF SQR MEAN SQR F
R-SQUARE ______ REGRESSION ___ 38354310.0 ________ _____
ADJ R-SQUARE 0.9372 RESIDUALS ___ 2470519.0 ________
S.E. OF EST. ______ TOTAL SS ___ __________
VARIABLE NAME B BETA S.E. B T
1. LABF 0.8214 0.9693 0.0401 _____
Constant ________
Model #1 Comments:
(b) ==== OLS MODEL #2 : DEPENDENT VARIABLE => TRIP ==================
MULTIPLE R 0.9694 * ANOVA * df SUM OF SQR MEAN SQR F
R-SQUARE ______ REGRESSION ___ 38363630.0 ________ _____
ADJ R-SQUARE 0.9351 RESIDUALS ___ __________ ________
S.E. OF EST. ______ TOTAL SS ___ __________
VARIABLE NAME B BETA S.E. B T
1. POP -0.0672 -0.2016 0.2094 ____
2. LABF 0.9917 1.1702 0.5326 ____
Constant _______
Model #2 Comments:
(c) Which, if any, is the better model? Why? Would POP by itself make a good model?
Table 7. Household Travel Survey Data +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | ID Trips Income Cars HHS DU | ID Trips Income Cars HHS DU | +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | 1 4 45.0 2 3 2 | 26 10 59.4 3 5 1 | | 2 3 40.2 1 2 2 | 27 8 58.5 3 4 1 | | 3 4 46.5 1 1 2 | 28 5 40.8 1 2 1 | | 4 5 50.4 2 3 2 | 29 8 54.3 2 4 1 | | 5 6 57.3 2 2 2 | 30 9 61.5 3 4 1 | | 6 6 49.8 2 3 1 | 31 5 50.1 2 2 2 | | 7 7 52.5 1 2 1 | 32 6 55.5 2 3 1 | | 8 7 55.5 2 3 1 | 33 10 61.2 3 4 1 | | 9 6 55.8 2 3 1 | 34 4 45.6 1 2 2 | | 10 3 42.6 1 2 2 | 35 8 63.9 2 4 1 | | 11 5 46.8 2 2 2 | 36 6 55.5 2 2 2 | | 12 7 50.4 2 3 1 | 37 5 49.8 2 3 2 | | 13 6 52.8 2 2 1 | 38 8 63.9 2 4 1 | | 14 4 43.2 1 1 2 | 39 4 42.9 1 1 2 | | 15 5 49.2 2 3 2 | 40 4 45.6 1 2 2 | | 16 5 49.2 2 3 2 | 41 8 60.6 3 4 2 | | 17 8 60.0 3 5 2 | 42 7 55.5 2 3 1 | | 18 3 39.0 1 1 2 | 43 5 48.6 2 3 2 | | 19 6 51.9 2 2 2 | 44 3 40.5 1 2 2 | | 20 9 63.0 3 4 1 | 45 2 37.5 1 2 2 | | 21 11 67.8 3 5 1 | 46 3 40.8 1 1 2 | | 22 5 49.5 2 3 2 | 47 2 37.5 1 2 2 | | 23 11 67.5 3 5 1 | 48 3 41.4 1 2 2 | | 24 2 35.4 1 2 2 | 49 2 35.1 1 2 2 | | 25 7 57.3 2 3 1 | 50 3 40.8 1 2 1 |
Last Updated: 29 April 2026 |